November 25, 2005: Western Block Party Meeting Planned
November 22, 2005: In Answer to My Critics
August 9, 2004: Price of Vigilance (Comment on the Helicopter Purchase)
December 27, 2002: Thoughts on the Year 2002
December 21, 2002: On the Future of Alberta
December 13, 2002: Kyoto, Gun Registry, Immigration -- No Choice for the West in Canada!
November 19, 2002: Harper Against the Tide!
November 10, 2002: How to Avoid the Mistakes of the Past as Support Rises for the "S" Word
November 6, 2002: U of A drops out of debate on Kyoto
November 2, 2002: Why the farmers should remain in jail & how we can support them
November 1, 2002: Thoughts for the Jailed Farmers
October 31, 2002: Farmer's Rally in Lethbridge & Kyoto Accord
December 23, 2000: "Chretien vows to salve the West"
The Western Block has planned a meeting for Friday,
December 2nd, at 7 p.m. at the Howard Johnson Inn & Suites on Elk
Lake Drive, Victoria, B.C.
The Western Block Party has decided to move into full-scale
election mode. We will not allow our enemies to define the debate. We are
entitled to certain free-time national broadcasts. As soon as we have registered
one candidate with the returning officer of one constituency, we will be
entitled to issue tax-deductible receipts. We need as many candidates as
possible. Anyone who is interested in our principles, and indeed shares them,
could be considered for candidacy with our party. Everyone who possibly can,
should attend the meeting set out above.
Even those people in Alberta who decided they want to start
a new political party separate, apart from the Western Block Party, should
consider that if they want a credible candidates in their ridings who can issue
tax receipts, who can identify with the cause of Western Independence. Perhaps
they should consider becoming one of our candidates.
The enemies of Western Canada, our freedom and our
prosperity, desire that the only alternatives available to Western Canadians
should be fundamentally Eastern-dominated parties like the Conservative party or
the Liberal party or the NDP. No one else is going to create the alternative of
a Western separatist party if we do not. Therefore we have to offer a new
alternative.
The one thing that makes our party significantly different
is that we stand clearly for the independence of the four western provinces by
referendum. In addition, we stand for the proposition that parties have all
failed and direct democracy is the only solution. Therefore we would propose a
Constitution , which would guarantee the constitutional right of referendum,
initiative, and recall, readily available to all the populace at all times. By
this means, all controversial decisions would be under the control of the
majority, even between elections. With modern technology, the Internet,
television, and other mass means of communication, voting on major issues can be
done from your home as quickly as dialing a telephone number. By this means
power could be returned to the hands of the people.
By the means of a referendum, independence can be, and is,
legally possible. We need to carry this message to the people of Western Canada
to give them hope, away from the corruption of the Ottawa government and all
that stands for.
If we don't do it now, when? If we don't do it here, where? If this job is not done by us, by whom will it be done? We are the authors of our destiny and the origin of our fate. For too long Western Canadians have struggled between various Toronto-centered options. The Western Block Party is a wave of the future for Eastern Canadians. By all means attend the meeting on December 2nd at Howard Johnson Inn. If you can’t be there in person, somehow send a message of support. Somehow send us the money we need to advertise our cause, to buy the signs, to buy the radio ads, to buy the newspaper ads, and to get our message out to the vast number of Western Canadians waiting for the solution to their grievances.
Yours for Independence,
Douglas Christie
I know defending Dr. Ahenakew, Mr. Keegstra, Mr. Zundel and
others has made me a target for my enemies. It is a lever to trick people into
condemning me. But I reasoned that if I did not have the courage to defend the
unpopular, free speech would die and Western Canada would be as corrupt and
shallow as Canada has become.
Separatism achieves
nothing if we don't have personal freedom. The Ottawa religion seems to have
infected minds so deeply that everyone believes it cannot be opposed, much less
contradicted. Many people need to be shocked out of this illusion. We are not
trying to be like all the politicians of the past.
My character hasn't
changed much since I came to the defense of smaller kids, bullied in the
schoolyard of Chapman School in Winnipeg, in the early 50's. I can't stand to
see an individual attacked by overwhelming power when all they have done is
express their opinions, or be themselves. I will always defend such people.
I find bullies
repulsive and gang violence most offensive. The one thing I find in common among
the thousands of people I've defended in the past 35 years as a lawyer, was the
fact they needed a defender because they were weak. I became their defender so
they would not stand alone against the mob. It seems some people would like
leaders who join the mob. Rather like Canada really, isn't it?
In defending the most
unpopular, I have realized what is missing in people, generally. It is simply
intellectual courage and principle. To stand for a new nation, at a time when
the old one is sinking into the cesspool of discarded ideas, it does no good for
people to follow the old patterns and believe the lies of your enemies.
To defend the
unpopular is to realize the value of courage and the meaning of discipline.
These two lessons are essential to break free of the patterns of the past. I
also learned that the most unpopular people are most frequently lied about. To
be baited into defending those people might be foolish, the nature of politics
being devious, but I believe I have exemplified the high price necessary to pay
for freedom and the willingness to pay it.
I could have let the
noose of conformity be tightened around all our necks while I quietly pursued my
personal political advantage. I could have stayed a Conservative. I could have
played the devious games.
But had I done so, by
the time I had the popularity to be elected, it would have had no power to
change anything. Silence on controversial matters would have been universally
imposed by law and conformity to regulations. I concede I have often failed, but
have you any idea how much worse for freedom it would have been, if I had not
fought?
Stay in the cesspool
of organized crime called Canada, reject me, and condemn me, and you just might
find out!
It is utterly amazing
to hear someone approve of political handlers crafting a policy. Is this the
attitude of a separatist or a political opportunist?
If you know anyone
more capable -- intellectually and morally -- to explain, advocate, and defend
Western Separatism, I suggest you let us know so we can all follow them. Do you
have a name? Is it yourself? What have you done in the last 30 years to make
Western Canada a new nation? Do you know someone with the intelligence, moral
courage, knowledge and experience, more than I have, to stand for our cause?
If so, please expose this paragon, so I will be able to retire in peace, knowing I have done my duty. To whom should I throw the torch?
Yours for
Independence,
Doug Christie
One has to wonder at the level of vigilance or resistance to corruption, which is current among Western Canadians. The typical Liberals like Mr. Ouellet, former Trudeau cabinet minister, who lives on as president of Canada Post is a classic example. Hundreds of thousands of unaccounted personal expenses, trips to Paris for Alphonso Galiano at post office expense and nobody blushes, least of all Mr. Ouellet. How many hundreds of millions in untendered contracts? We are only left to speculate. We should not be alarmed however because Glen Clark’s NDP Government of British Columbia purchased $500,000,000 dollars worth of fast ferries (later sold for $6,000,000) without contracts and no one got fired.
Perhaps people now are just accustomed to corruption and incompetence. Over time, corruption becomes more acceptable the more it is practiced with impunity. Take for example the F-18A repair contracts, which were the subject of a successful bid by Bristol Aerospace of Winnipeg. Well, when we say "successful," we mean before Brian Mulroney and the Quebec mafia went to work. It was the bid to do the job for less and would have saved the taxpayers millions. But it was not to be. The contract had to go to Montréal, the home of Gagliano-style politics. Please understand, this is not the people of Québec, i.e. separatists. It is the federalist fraud artists who bow five times per day to Ottawa, the source of all favours.
What was different about that time in the 1980’s was the level of public awareness and reaction. The reaction was swift and strong. Western Canada was being robbed and people spoke out. Separatism was revitalized. The atmosphere was electric and memberships to the Western Canada Concept poured in. Contrast today and the Sikorski Helicopter deal worth $4.5 billion. Just look at who gets what: Atlantic Canada’s aerospace industry gets $1 billion. Ontario gets $2 billion. Québec gets $1 billion. The West gets $390 million or about 10% of the total contract price. That is for ½ the country worth 30% of the population – 10%!
The more ominous sign in this, however, is the silence in the West. Other than 25 lines of commentary by Gillian Cosgrave on July 31, 2004 in the National Post, I saw it mentioned nowhere else. No public outcry exists. Nobody asks why! Stephen Harper is in his usual sober silence. The opposition says nothing in Ottawa. With the level of corruption and division in the Liberal Party on June 28, 2004, if they couldn’t win Ontario then, they never will - so silence is probably appropriate for Conservatives. Maybe the Liberals will throw them a small patronage position somewhere down the line if they are nice.
The depressing fact is that Canada’s family compact has made corruption so acceptable that all parties actually accept it. SIRC (Security Intelligence Review Committee) the spy regulator of Canada has members from Alliance (Ray Speaker), Baljet Chadha (generous Liberal and NDP donor), Gary Filmon, former Conservative Premier, Roy Romano, former NDP Premier, and they all tacitly agree to keep Ernst Zundel in jail without charge and with the secret trial like the Star Chamber handled by an ex-Tory Solicitor-General, Pierre Blais. Nothing seems wrong to them. On both issues, the helicopter and the secret trial there appears to be an ominous silence. Well, not from me!
Yours for Independence,
Douglas Christie
As the
year 2002 draws to a close, I think back over all the things that have happened
during this year, related to the subject of Western separatism.
There have
been so many reasons for Western separatism that have emerged in the previous
year that I really wonder why there isn't a general uprising, at least in
Alberta. Farmers have gone to jail for selling their own wheat, and gun owners
are going to be turned into criminals for simply retaining the right to their
private property. The Kyoto Accord has been passed without the slightest regard
for the long-term effects on Alberta.
The
Alliance party, (the Western Canadian protest party), has been steadily eroded
and ridiculed in the eastern media. And for all of its posturing and bragging,
this political party has never achieved one iota of significant change. It is
very appropriate that it changed its name from the Reform Party. They would be
embarrassed to have to realize that nothing has ever been or ever will be
reformed in Canada. This situation drives home the necessity -- to any
reasonable person -- of achieving Western independence by the simple, logical,
democratic and legal means provided for us in the Clarity Act passed by the
parliament of Canada in the year 2001.
And yet we
see a reluctance in the people of Alberta, at least as reflected by their
elected government, to move toward building a new alternative.
I think
the real reason why this has not become an overwhelming tidal wave of public
support is simply that no one has been going out among the people to raise the
banner of Independence.
I feel
personally responsible for this failure. I have persisted in the cause of
justice for individuals in hundreds of cases before the courts. For some of
these people I have succeeded. But as I succeed for a few individuals, the cause
of freedom, prosperity and Independence for us all, slips away.
Time is
not on my side. In April 2003 I will be 57 years of age. I have been publicly
advocating that the western provinces separate from Canada and form a new nation
since 1975. Although the subscriber and supporter base of the Western Canada
Concept is growing, and continues to be a widespread movement, it has not had
overwhelming success for the simple reason that I have failed to take up the
cause and effectively advocate for it since approximately 1980.
I've
always thought that if I didn't do the job, someone else would do it, and
perhaps would do it better. I have waited and waited, and no one better has come
along. In February I intend to take two weeks and try to push the movement
forward as a mass movement. I hope that you, the reader, will see the importance
of this occasion and commit yourself to helping make these meetings a true
renaissance of hope for our fellow citizens here in Western Canada.
If not you
and me, then who? If not now, when? If not here, then where will the cause of
liberty find its reason and hope? We are the source of our destiny and draw the
boundaries for our life's achievements by what we do, or fail to do.
If we are
to achieve our great goal of a new nation, we must remember the immortal words
and then feast upon them in our hearts:
"By oppression, woes and pains, for your sons in servile chains, we would shed our dearest veins, but they shall be free!"
The Supreme Court of Canada has seldom been clearer in its denunciation of all moral or religious claims. It is now mandated that a "gay" schoolteacher has the right, contrary to the wishes of parents and school board, to read gay literature to kindergarten and grade 1 students.
This, Madame Justice McLachlin assures us, is necessary because "a school board must not allow itself to be dominated by one religious or moral point of view." Consider for a moment, the implications of this profoundly amoral and anti-religious statement. Simply put, if one religious or moral point of view cannot be allowed to dominate, then how can any religious or moral point of view which asserts moral or religious correctness, be allowed to express itself. In a word it cannot.
What the Supreme Court of
Canada has done by this dictate is
to state that in the name of liberal
tolerance, no morality or religion will be tolerated.
It is the epitome of liberal tyranny.
This is a prime example of what happens when courts make judgments on
morality and religion. No judges
are especially qualified in either of these two important spheres.
For this very reason, there was originally intended to be the maintenance
and supremacy of the Christian religion in our society as previously
constituted. This was never a
legalistic principle, since it was never established in any constitution, but it
was a generally accepted principle by the vast majority of people that this was
a Christian country. This did not
mean that many people agreed on matters of doctrine, dogma, or even faith at times.
However these matters were left implicitly in the hands of the
theologians.
How ironic it is that
Madame Justice MacLachlin and six other Supreme Court justices could never
tolerate a teacher who expressed
any doubts about the Holocaust. How
ironic it is that they could also never tolerate the teacher who expressed his
Christian principles, and beliefs or principles outside the school, as Malcolm
Ross did. They could never teach
tolerance of the views of James Keegstra for instance.
He was not allowed to discuss his views of the origin of the Bolshevik
Revolution for instance. It seems clear from this latest decision that the Supreme
Court has certain views that it wishes to tolerate, and certain other views of
which it does not wish to approve and therefore believes should not be
tolerated. It boils down to the
personal preferences of the various justices of the Supreme Court of Canada.
Such is the nature of tolerance in the so-called liberal society.
Liberals tolerate liberals and obliterate everybody else.
In a democracy it was
always assumed that people were to
be trusted with moral and religious decisions.
Pierre Trudeau decided, and the brilliant legislators of his day agreed,
to entrench into a new constitution
a Charter of Rights which would give judges the power to define the limits of
the elected representatives of the people.
By this means they effectively removed any moral responsibilities from the Legislature and put it into the hands
of the judiciary. But who educated
or qualified the judiciary to make decisions about religious or moral matters?
They had no special training, skill, or ability in any of these fields.
Therefore, in effect out of a fear
of imposing their own somewhat inarticulate ideas, they have chosen to make a
religion of tolerance and obliterate all religious and moral values.
The principle of equality means
in the end that no one is right, and no one is wrong, and nothing is right, and
nothing is wrong. Sadly, in such as state, everything
is wrong. And such a state is
Canada today.
When ethnical relativism is mandatory, ethical absolutes become impossible. In practical terms, when right cannot condemn evil, evil will need an equal opportunity to indoctrinate ("educate") even the most vulnerable.
Today on
the 21st of December 2002, I have the opportunity to write again on the
whole subject of Western Canada’s situation in confederation. We see that the
Kyoto Accord has been approved. All Western Canadians are now aware that
implementation is the next step in the process. This will effectively destroy
the resource-producing sectors of Alberta. It will effectively increase the
opportunities for coal-fired electrical generation in South China. There, Mr.
Chretien and his friend Mr. Demarais have financial interests. They stand to
benefit on a global scale.
What would
they care, after Mr. Chretien’s term of office is over, for the disappearance
of the economy of Alberta? Obviously this is only going to matter to the people
who live in Alberta.
But what
will Albertans do? If they do not separate and form a new nation, then they show
Chretien has won again. The Liberal party will be in power for the next 50
years. And Paul Martin or some other Quebecer will be the prime minister for
another long period of time. They will always make laws to the benefit of the
political elites.
In the
Supreme Court of Canada, where the laws are really being made, they just ruled
the Surrey school board cannot exclude a reading by a teacher in the class of kindergarten
students of stories about the wonderful benefits of homosexual life. Madame
Justice McLachlin has said that in view of our need to tolerate diversity, no
school board can restrict access to the widest possible ideas of sexual
orientation. This is the direction of the new Canada. Soon will it be possible
for all homosexuals to demonstrate their lifestyle in class as well as to read
stories about it?
No doubt
in order to overcome intolerance and homophobia, kindergarten students will have
to see their teacher demonstrate his affection to his boyfriend in their class.
Such is the caliber of judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada, that there is
really no limit to its application. And yet we have no say in who is to be
appointed to the Supreme Court. That was, and remains, the prerogative of the
prime minister. That is the Canadian way.
And yet
Albertans do nothing about it. When the Supreme Court of Canada forced a
religious institution to hire an openly homosexual teacher (the Vriend case),
likewise the premier of Alberta did nothing. This indicates the betrayal of the
fundamental values of the basically European Christian population of Western
Canada. We are being betrayed by our leaders in Ottawa and by the premier of
Alberta as well.
But what
will you do? Albertans have many options. They could, of course, vote for some
replacement for Ralph Klein who would be equally disingenuous in his assertion
of fundamental European Christian values. This however has been done before,
when they replaced Premier Lougheed with Klein. The result has been obviously to
eliminate any effective voice for the people. Their values are trampled by their
leadership and no new leadership emerges to give them any real choice.
That's referred to as “the democratic way.” However it need not be the only alternative for Albertans in effect to surrender.
They
could, of course, separate. They could, of course, establish their own
Constitution, build their own identity and preserve their own culture. They
could, of course, control their own immigration. They could, of course, create
their own money. They could, of course, establish their own transportation
policies, linguistic policies and other policies. They could establish their own
flag. They could establish their own national anthem. They could, of course,
create access to the Pacific Rim through British Columbia for their oil, natural
gas, freshwater, forestry, fishery, and agricultural production. They could, of
course, do all this peacefully, legally, and democratically by a referendum that
has been initiated by them, and forced upon their government when a majority of
them say to the rest of the world "we have had enough!"
This
moment in eternity is a moment of decision in which you can say those very words
for yourself. If you refuse to make a choice at this moment, you are
surrendering your destiny into the hands of those who have already indicated a
deliberate intention to destroy you and everything you stand for.
But what
will you do?
Yours for
independence,
Douglas Christie
On Thursday the 12th of December,
after spending the past week and a half in Vancouver on the Seifert case before
Mr. Justice Romilly, I am finally able to put on paper my thoughts over this
amazing last 14 days.
On Tuesday, December 10th, the
Liberals, like a flock of sheep, approved the Kyoto Accord in principle.
Previously Ralph Klein had started his little wiggle worm dance and proclaimed
to the whole world that he thought Paul Martin might be a savior. It is, sadly,
so typical of the premiers of Alberta that they have continually made loud
defensive noises and when the chips are down they negotiate away the rights of
the people of Alberta.
When Mr. Chretien was asked whether Mr.
Martin would be expected to uphold the Kyoto Accord he replied with unusual
bluntness.
"He has no choice, because it's an
international obligation we have. And Canada is a country with a great
reputation that when we are involved internationally we respect our word."
This clearly signifies what has happened. Canada and all its citizens have been
sold into bondage by an international agreement entered into by a handful of
people who were never elected and whose identity remains a mystery even today.
In this way is freedom destroyed. In this
way have the people been hamstrung and hand-cuffed. And what does Ralph Klein
propose to do? He proposes to have us wait until the Liberals pick a new
prime minister from Québec, Paul Martin, at which time he proposes to negotiate
with a new prime minister. How very typical of the treachery of a politician who
speaks in terms of "wiggle room". Canada is required to reduce its
greenhouse gas emissions to 6 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. At the same
time from 1990 to 2012 our population will have increased by 20 percent
exclusively from immigration from the Third World.
Any rational person should realize that
reducing carbon emissions which reduce greenhouse gases while increasing your
population by 20 percent means a substantial reduction in the standard of living
and a vast increase in federal taxes and controls on the way we burn oil and gas
in our cars, in our home, and in our farm machinery.
What it amounts to is a vast increase in
government control of our lives and was celebrated by the same pompous arrogant
fat and overbearing Liberals who ruled the country for 70 of the last 100 years.
And then what will the people of Alberta do? That remains to be seen . They are
in fact the prime targets of the Liberal government’s arrogance and pomposity.
In the past Alberta has put off the other inevitable confrontations. If Alberta
does not fight now with a massive uprising of separatism, its future is that of
the Maritimes. In a short time it will be begging for federal handouts.
In the gun control registry fiasco there is no limit. The Liberals in the leadership mode are attacking each other for a change. This of course will happen, and the moment the new leader is chosen he will consolidate power among his other Liberal friends, as they always do. More interesting appears to be the fate of Warren Kinsella, the “anti-racist" who used to advertise his position as a Chretien confidante. He early on tied his star to Alan Rock, the founder [or flounder] of the gun registry. It appears both will now go down in flames together.
In the real news is the totally ineffectual
demands of the opposition for an “explanation.” Ask as they repeatedly do,
the simple question: “How much is it going to cost to finish the registry?”
and “How much will it cost every year to maintain it?” They just get no
answer. The auditor-general can’t get any answer, either. She has quit even
asking. The opposition isn't able to get any answer. So who is accountable to
the taxpayer for this $1 billion loss? The answer is “No one is!” The
Liberals say there's enough blame for everybody. This is the true sickness of
the Canadian system. No one is ever accountable and the money just disappears in
a tax gobbling haze.
But the gun registry is only the
latest symptom. The real tragedy is the lack of public awareness.
Most people think this is just about guns.
It's really about government and the lack of public control upon spending. Guns
are merely the latest example. Bilingualism, the Mirabel Airport, the 1976
Olympic Games, which cost 3.5 billion or 30 times more than they were estimated,
the Olympic Stadium which at completion cost 5 times the $310 million estimated,
and the BC fast ferries, the Skytrain to nowhere in Vancouver, the Alberta Swan
Hills waste treatment plants, the Skydome in Toronto, even the F-18A repair
contract which should have gone to Winnipeg, the National Energy Policy of
Trudeau, and now the Kyoto Accord . Each and every one of these demonstrates
that Canada is a corrupt and incompetent federal system which cannot and should
not survive.
Dear Reader, if you are gun owner and think
that if the registry is defeated you can go back to sleep and all is right with
the world, please wake up!. Not only will they be back for your guns, they will
be back for your hard-earned cash and your freedom as they continue to spy upon
you, tax you and take away all that was yours and which you had worked for. If
you don't peacefully rise up and demand a referendum in your province and get
together now to build a new nation in Western Canada, you will never have
another chance. We can create a country where the people have the real power
because they all are really awake.
In the December 11th issue of the Times
Colonist newspaper a story entitled "Asians change the face of urban
Canada" drove home the fate of each of us if we allow Ottawa to continue to
control immigration policy. It states "immigrants from China, India and the
Middle East are changing the face of Canadian cities, while traditional European
groups are fading and greying, data released Tuesday by Statistics Canada
show." Since 1996 Canada has 70,200 more Punjabi speakers, 54,400 more
Arabic speakers , and 43,100 more people speak Urdu the language of Pakistan.
In total, 5.3 million people in Canada speak
neither French nor English, an increase of 12 percent since the last census in
1996.
In response a Mr. Morton Beiser, director of
the Center for Excellence in Research on Immigration and Settlement [typical of
an Ottawa bureaucrat] says "and not only how do we help immigrants settle
but how do we help the receiving society receive and not feel threatened, but
feel that they have a place as well?"
My comments as an English-speaking person
are first, why shouldn't they feel threatened? They are threatened. We are
threatened. Our way of life is threatened. We will soon be a minority in our own
country.
15 percent of Vancouver's population speaks
Chinese as a mother tongue. In Calgary, in Edmonton Chinese speakers are the
most numerous foreign language group, surpassing the traditional immigrant
tongues of German and Ukrainian. The new immigrants are integrating into
Canadian society but unlike those in the past they have learned that they can
keep their traditional culture. There is no pressure to assimilate because the
language pools are now sufficiently large to function in the foreign language
without any need to adopt English or French.
These "new immigrants" are
transforming Canada from predominantly Caucasian society into a multiracial
country. This in the attitude of
the New World Order is inevitable in the age of globalization.
What the globalists fail to recognize is
that not every society values individual freedom as the traditional society of
Canada did. Not every society will be as tolerant to us as we have been to them.
Soon we will learn that discrimination against us will not be prevented by the
politically correct Liberals or the equally obsequious Human Rights Tribunals or
thought-police and commissars the Liberals have established. In fact, the
Liberals have sold our heritage and our birthright for a mess of political
potage.
It is not my desire to disparage the Chinese
or Indian culture which motivates me to desire to protect my own. It is a right
of every people in their land and territory to maintain their language, their
culture, their traditions, and their values. Otherwise each and every country
becomes subject to the most prolific population of the world in a mass of
homogenization and in cultural disintegration.
It is only by the preservation of a
distinctive national identity that any ethnic diversity and cultural uniqueness
can ever hope to survive. It was wrong of the British, French and other European
nations to attempt to impose their cultures on China , India, and Africa or
other countries in colonial times. It is equally wrong now in our own country to
subordinate our culture to theirs.
In short we have a right to survive as a
people just as they do, and it should never be regarded as racism to say so. But
to the Liberal any attempted self-preservation in the maintenance of our
traditional culture is anathema. This because they know the Liberals have always
been elected by immigrant populations in Canada. That is predominantly why those
in Western Canada who desire to preserve our way of life are always going to be
attacked by the Liberals of Ontario, Quebec, and the Maritimes. Toronto today is
predominantly a non-European city. Stay in Canada and so will Calgary, Edmonton,
Vancouver, Regina, Saskatoon, and Winnipeg.
We must separate soon or surrender forever the identity of our traditional culture. This is an hour of decision. Our destiny depends on what we do today.
The following excerpts are from The Edmonton Sun of November 18, 2002, in an article by Michelle Mark: